Scored in public · rubric v1Prices re-checked July 30, 2026
The Quiet Standard

Methodology · rubric v1

The methodology: our rubric, weights and rounding, in public

A rating you can’t audit is an adjective wearing a number. This page is the audit: the dimensions, the weights, the rounding rule, and the limits of what a documentation-based review desk can honestly claim.

By the Quiet Standard review deskPublished July 31, 2026✓ Facts verified July 30, 2026This page is the rubric

The arithmetic

Every tool receives 0–10 in five dimensions. Scores are multiplied by fixed weights, summed, multiplied by ten and rounded half-up to a Standard Score out of 100. The same table appears on every review with that tool’s numbers filled in — if our maths ever disagrees with our prose, the maths is the review and the prose owes you a correction.

Rubric v1 — dimensions and weights, fixed across all reviews
Silence weight 0.35How much noise actually disappears, and what survives of the voice
Toll weight 0.20What it costs your machine and your patience: hardware demands, setup friction
Wallet weight 0.20Value against price, free tier included
Fit weight 0.15Platforms covered and how naturally it sits in a call-day workflow
Candor weight 0.10How honestly the vendor documents limits, pricing and privacy

What we verify, and how

Prices, free-tier limits, platform support and hardware requirements are checked against vendor pages and help centres, and every page prints its verification date. When a vendor changes a price, the score can change — that is the system working, not failing. Facts on this site were last re-verified July 30, 2026.

What we refuse to claim

We do not run an acoustics laboratory, and we decline to invent one. Where a judgment can only be settled by your room, your accent and your hardware — exactly how a suppressor treats your voice — our reviews say so and point you at the free tier to run the test that matters. Docs-based scoring has limits; pretending otherwise is how this category got so adjectival.

Independence, mechanically

Some reviewed tools pay referral commissions; some pay nothing and outscore ones that do. The wall is mechanical rather than moral: scores are computed from the rubric table before any recommendation box is written, and the funding page lists every commercial relationship. NVIDIA and SteelSeries pay us nothing; both sit above Descript, which links through an affiliate route. The ledger does not know who pays.

Versioning

This is rubric v1, in force since launch. If weights ever change, the rubric gets a new version number, every score is recomputed, and the change is logged here — silently re-marking old homework is not correction, it is laundering.

Further reading